HOME
Email Us
SITE SEARCH
Family History
Victorian Era
Phrenology
George Burgess
Relevant Links
|
A Victorian Scrapbook
A Scrapbook of Newspaper Articles Compiled by George Burgess (1829-1905)
Victorian Family, People and Relationships
Low cut dresses
Previous | Home | Next
Transcript from original newspaper article: -
|
 MR EDITOR. – And so you would
like to know my opinion on low-necked dresses, would you? Well, you shall
have it for what it is worth; and, though my ability is small, my intentions
are excellent, and what I do is done with all my heart even to “speaking
the naked truth at all times,” as you say. But the subject of low-necked
dresses is rather a delicate one, and I hardly know how to approach it
at all. It should be handled very nicely, for there are strong predjuces
in the minds of many people. Both pro and con. But to be honest, and express
my candid opinion, I do not believe that anybody ever was opposed to reasonably
low-necked dresses, save scrawny old maids or worn out old bachelors.
Now, it is well known that when the mother of us all, Mrs Eve, was in
a state of purity and innocence, she dispensed with dresses altogether,
and there is nothing on record to show that Adam blushed when he looked
at his rib; or that she felt any compunctions of conscience at all about
it. But no sooner did she make a faux pas and listen to the words of the
tempter, than she went to work to exercise her ingenuity in the art of
dress-making, and got up an extempore sort of demi-toilette out of fig-leaves;
so that it was not till after she had lost the perfection of her modesty,
that she had any idea that she was immodest. Her daughters, too, profited
by the maternal example, and so they became more and more wicked and refined,
added garment to garment, till women looked like bundles of dry goods,
and waddled along, their fleshy components hidden in balloons of tape,
white muslin and crinoline. My grandmother tells me that it is not so
very many years ago, since a great fuss was made because women wore their
dresses so high! And cross old bachelors, and crosser old maids, who had
no “symmetry” to boast of, used to complain sadly of the immodesty
of those who used to be able to add a nicely turned ankle to the list
of their charms; and raised such a terrible din about their ears, that
they were glad to pull their dresses down a foot or two, and then a yard
or two till every woman resembles a locomotive, and drew a long train
behind her. So you see that do as we will, the world will not be satisfied,
and we shall ever be too high or too low to please the male and female
“Miss Nincles” of creation. Now I do admit that there are
some women in the world, on whom a low necked dress would be an absolute
wickedness, which could serve no good purpose neither useful or ornamental,
without it might be to enable some poor medical student, who could not
indulge in the luxury of “a head and shoulders,” to study
the structure of the “bony system” from their exposed anatomy.
And, I do not think that even such facilities could justify them in inflicting
such torture as they do upon all who look at them it is painful in the
extreme to meet such cases. I have one in my eye just now, but as she
has on a high-necked dress at present, I shall not expose her. But she,
as well as you, ought to be much obliged to me for my forbearances.
Now the whole thing lies in a nut-shell. If a woman has
to good bust, a pretty neck, nicely set on good plump shoulders, and looks
healthy and rosy, I see no good reason why she should encase herself to
the chin in stiff muslin and silk. A man of refinement gazes on a lovely
woman with pure eyes as an artist gazes on a picture, for to the pure
all things are pure, and I don’t believe in making deformities of
ourselves, or hiding our light under a bushel to please prudes, who are
envious because they have no light to hide. A truly virtuous woman is
always a modest woman, and no virtuous woman will ever make a vain display
of her charms or seek to inspire anything but pure thoughts in others.
As for those ghouls and brutes in human form, who only see in a beautiful
woman incentives to unholy thoughts, I ignore them altogether. I would
not dress to please them nor to displease them; they are worthy of no
consideration, and should not be taken into account. Every woman knows
in what style of costume she appears to the best advantage; if she does
not, she in no daughter of Eve; and so long as women are pure in heart,
there is no danger that they will “overstep the modesty of nature”
in dressing according to their tastes; while if they are not pure, thought
they wore a salt sack tied over their ears, they could not disgust their
moral deformity.
Men who don’t like low neck dresses are under no
obligation to look at those who wear them. All they have to do is look
another way – if the can. And the women who dislike them because
they are nit adapted to their style or because they are too prudish to
wear them, can either put their heads in a bag or turn up their noses
till they are tired of the exercise. I have not said all I think, for
I think a good deal more than I dare say, but I have said enough to give
you all you wanted – my opinion....
|
|